The connection between ancient Jewish concepts of reality and contemporary multiverse physics may initially seem improbable. After all, how could classical texts, rooted in millennia of tradition, relate to the cutting-edge ideas in modern physics? However, a closer examination of the Jewish interpretative methods, particularly the Talmudic concepts of *Peshat* (פשט) and *Derash* (דרש), as well as the mystical *Midrash* (מדרש), reveals an intriguing parallel to the debates and frameworks in multiverse theory. By comparing these two seemingly disparate realms of thought, we can uncover a fascinating convergence that explores the multiplicity of existence and the underlying structure of reality.
### *Peshat* (פשט), *Derash* (דרש), and *Midrash* (מדרש): Three Approaches to Understanding Reality
At the heart of Jewish classical interpretation are two primary modes of exegesis: *Peshat* (פשט) and *Derash* (דרש). *Peshat* (פשט) refers to the literal, straightforward meaning of the text, emphasizing a historical or contextual understanding of scripture. It seeks to explain the narrative based on its explicit language, grammar, and historical context. In contrast, *Derash* (דרש) represents a more symbolic, allegorical approach that delves deeper into the text’s spiritual, metaphysical, and sometimes hidden meanings. While *Peshat* (פשט) focuses on the surface level and historical truth, *Derash* (דרש) invites a mystical exploration, where every phrase could potentially have multiple layers of meaning, often transcending the written word itself (Sperling & Lederbard, 1980).
The tradition of *Midrash* (מדרש), which is closely tied to *Derash* (דרש), takes this further by actively creating new narratives or explanations of biblical events. *Midrash* (מדרש) often fills gaps in the biblical story, adding layers of interpretation that range from the mystical to the ethical. For example, *Midrash* (מדרש) might transform a simple verse into a rich philosophical or ethical teaching, expanding on what is explicitly stated in the text. This deeply imaginative, almost “creative” approach, draws on oral traditions and mystical thought to explore the hidden dimensions of scripture. In many ways, *Midrash* (מדרש) suggests that the text itself is alive, capable of spawning an infinite number of interpretations, much as *Derash* (דרש) and *Midrash* (מדרש) invoke different worlds of meaning from a single source.
This tension between *Peshat* (פשט), *Derash* (דרש), and *Midrash* (מדרש) reflects a broader intellectual and philosophical divide concerning the nature of reality itself. Should reality be understood through its observable, measurable aspects, as in the literal reading of a text, or is there a deeper, more abstract layer to existence that only reveals itself through interpretation, analogy, or even imagination? This philosophical division mirrors the debate in modern physics between those who believe in a singular, deterministic universe and those who entertain the possibility of multiple, parallel universes. Thus, one finds an intriguing parallel between these Jewish modes of interpretation and contemporary discussions in the field of physics, particularly the idea of the multiverse.
The Multiverse and Its Parallels to *Derash* (דרש) and *Midrash* (מדרש)
One of the most well-known theories in modern physics, particularly in quantum mechanics, is the *Many-Worlds Interpretation* (MWI) of quantum physics. Proposed by Hugh Everett in 1957, MWI suggests that for every quantum event that occurs, every possible outcome results in the creation of a new, parallel universe. In this view, the universe is not singular or deterministic, but rather a branching structure, where countless realities coexist, each corresponding to a different possible outcome of quantum events (Everett, 1957).
This model of infinite parallel worlds shares striking similarities with the *Derashic* (דרש) method of classical interpretation. Just as *Derash* (דרש) proposes that a single verse can have multiple, sometimes infinite, interpretations, the multiverse theory posits that every quantum event generates multiple universes, each with its own reality. Similarly, *Midrash* (מדרש) presents a creative process of "reading between the lines" and expanding upon the written text to discover new meanings, mirroring the process of branching universes that arise from quantum events. Both the *Derashic* (דרש) interpretation and the multiverse concept challenge the idea of a singular, fixed reality. In the case of *Derash* (דרש), every scriptural passage contains an abundance of meanings waiting to be uncovered through allegorical or symbolic reading. Similarly, in multiverse theory, every quantum event gives birth to a potentially infinite number of new realities. Both frameworks celebrate the idea of multiplicity and endless possibility, suggesting that reality is not a single, immutable entity but an expansive, branching structure, with each interpretation (or each quantum event) giving rise to a new possibility.
M-Theory and Its Relation to *Derash* (דרש) and *Midrash* (מדרש)
M-Theory, a more advanced and comprehensive approach to string theory, is another contemporary scientific framework that speaks to the potential for multiple, co-existing universes. Emerging in the mid-1990s, M-Theory proposes that the universe consists of not just three spatial dimensions, but multiple dimensions—up to eleven in some versions—each potentially hosting its own universe (Greene, 1999). M-Theory suggests that our familiar, three-dimensional reality is just one "brane" (a higher-dimensional object) floating in a higher-dimensional space. The theory suggests that the various dimensions could contain multiple, parallel realities that are connected in complex, unseen ways, and that the fabric of reality itself could be much more interconnected and multi-dimensional than we perceive.
M-Theory shares an uncanny resemblance to the multiplicity inherent in Jewish mystical traditions, especially in their more esoteric interpretations of scripture. Much like the *Derash* (דרש) and *Midrash* (מדרש) methods, M-Theory challenges our understanding of what is possible within the known universe, proposing an existence far grander and more complex than we can easily imagine. Just as *Midrash* (מדרש) encourages us to expand the boundaries of scriptural interpretation to uncover hidden meanings, M-Theory invites us to imagine new realms of existence, each potentially filled with different laws of physics and dimensions that we can’t yet perceive.
The Deterministic Universe and *Peshat* (פשט)
In contrast to *Derash* (דרש) and the multiplicity of *Midrash* (מדרש), *Peshat* (פשט) emphasizes the literal, historical reading of scripture, proposing a universe that is orderly, deterministic, and governed by natural laws. This interpretation mirrors the classical view of the universe in physics, where the laws of nature govern a single, observable reality, unfolding according to predictable principles. Stephen Hawking's work in cosmology, particularly his exploration of the Big Bang and black holes, represents the kind of deterministic framework that resonates with *Peshat* (פשט). According to Hawking’s model, the universe operates within a set of well-defined physical laws, and while quantum mechanics may introduce probabilities, the overarching framework remains coherent, stable, and predictable (Hawking, 1988).
Bridging the Gap: Multiverse Theory, *Midrash* (מדרש), and Classical Interpretation
Interestingly, some contemporary researchers suggest that advanced mathematical models used to understand multiverse theories could provide new insights into the interpretation of ancient texts. Just as multiverse physics employs sophisticated simulations and mathematical equations to model alternative realities, scholars might use similar techniques to unlock new meanings within classical texts. Such an approach could allow for a more nuanced reading of sacred texts, where the multiplicity of meanings inherent in scripture is recognized and explored in ways that transcend traditional exegesis (Althusser, 1970). This cross-pollination between the realms of physics and classical interpretation offers a fascinating glimpse into the ways in which both fields might inform one another.
Conclusion
The dichotomy between *Peshat* (פשט), *Derash* (דרש), and *Midrash* (מדרש) in Jewish classical interpretation mirrors the debate between a singular, deterministic universe and the infinite possibilities suggested by multiverse theory and M-Theory. While *Peshat* (פשט) corresponds to the literal, observable universe governed by physical laws, *Derash* (דרש) and *Midrash* (מדרש) align with the multiplicity and complexity of the multiverse, where each quantum event generates a new reality. This parallel suggests a deeper philosophical connection between these ancient methods of interpretation and contemporary scientific theories. By exploring the intersections between classical exegesis, Jewish mysticism, and modern physics, we begin to uncover the profound interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate worlds, offering new insights into both our spiritual and scientific understanding of reality.
Works Cited
Althusser, Louis. "On the materialist theory of the state." *E. Balibar, R. Daghash*, 1970.
Everett, Hugh D. "Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics." *Reviews of Modern Physics*, vol. 29, no. 3, 1957, pp. 454-462.
Greene, Brian. *The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory
Comments